Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I'm currently learning special relativity in high school and we only primarily deal with what happens when an object is moving at constant relativistic speeds. But what if the object slowed back down to a stop?

I observe length contraction for an object at relativistic speeds, when it returns to be stationary, does it go back to its original length?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 20 down vote accepted

Calculating the effect of acceleration in special relativity is straightforward, but I suspect the algebra is a bit much at high school level. See John Baez's article on the Relativistic Rocket for a summary, or see Chapter 6 of Gravitation by Misner, Thorne and Wheeler for a more detailed analysis.

When you're first introduced to SR you tend to be told about time dilation and length contraction and given formulae to calculate them. However this is at best an oversimplification and at worst actively misleading. When you're looking at some object moving relative to you you do indeed measure the object's length to be contracted, but what actually happens is that the two end points in the object's rest frame transform into points at slightly different times in your rest frame. You measure the object to be contracted because you're measuring the end points at slightly different times. There is no sense in which the object is squeezed by it's high velocity.

Any object has a proper length, which is equal to its length in its rest frame. The proper length is an invariant and all observers will measure the same proper length regardless of their relative velocity. If you consider proper length then the object is not contracted.

Anyhow, the answer to your question is that when the object comes to a stop relative to you its length has not changed. This is because it never did change - the change you measured was due to the coordinates you were using not matching the coordinates the object was using. When the object comes to rest in your frame you and the object are using the same coordinates (at worst differing in the position of the origin) so both of you measure the length to be the proper length.

share|cite|improve this answer
+1 for actively misleading. MTW's Gravitation may be a bit much for high school, but there is an excellent introductory book by Taylor and Wheeler, "Spacetime Physics", which explains the physics of what actually happens, complete with diagrams, problems etc. It should be quite accessible for a high school student. – Anton Tykhyy Mar 28 '14 at 10:54
I also strongly recommend Taylor and Wheeler's book Exploring Black Holes. This is a bit harder, but anyone who did maths to an advanced level at high school (i.e. in the UK did A level maths) should be able to get somethong from it. – John Rennie Mar 28 '14 at 12:11

Everything remains relativistic. However, the variation between the Newtonian and Einstein relativity is of the order of $v^2/c^2$. So when this number drops below observable error, you can't tell the difference.

share|cite|improve this answer
The simpler relativity is rather Galilean, not Newtonian. Newtonian mechanics is based on Galilean principle of relativity. – Ruslan Mar 28 '14 at 9:25
The bulk of the physics is based on Newton's model, and it probably confuses people more to place multiple names into the same concept. – wendy.krieger Mar 28 '14 at 9:35
I'm a partisan of calling the older relativity "Galilean" rather than "Newtonian", but both names appear in the literature. – dmckee Mar 28 '14 at 15:03

If you are the observer and you are observing a car move in front of you, then the clock in the car will appear to move slower than the clock in your reference frame and the length of the car will appear to be contracted to you in the direction of motion. All these effects get magnified as the velocity of the car approaches that of light. In the same way, all these effects get less and less magnified if the velocity decreases and completely stops when there is no relative velocity between you and the car.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.