Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Can any antisymmetric function, i.e., a function of $N$ spatial-plus-spin variables $\{x_i\ | \ i= 1, \ldots, N\}$ satisfying $$ \psi(x_1,\ldots, x_i, \ldots, x_j, \ldots, x_N) = -\psi(x_1,\ldots, x_j, \ldots, x_i, \ldots, x_N)\ ,$$ always be written as a Slater-Determinant of functions ("orbitals"), not necessarily solutions to Schrödinger's Equation? (I know that there are no orbitals describing interacting electrons, but they may [or may not] be solutions to a "Schrödinger-like equation, but that's beside the point.)

(As context: I have been reading up on Density Functional Theory. I am teaching an optional second course on quantum mechanics and I am explaining some of DFT's basic concepts. In Parr & Yang's "Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules" (Oxford University Press, 1989) it is mentioned that there is a proof that any "reasonable" (electron) density can be derived from an antisymmetric wave function which can always be written as Slater-Determinant of orbitals. The authors cite a couple of articles on some journals to which we, at the university where I work, have no subscription [Phys. Rev. A & B, Int. J. Quantum Chem.] )

share|cite|improve this question
which articles are these? – Danu Mar 27 '14 at 8:00
The articles are: 1. Gilbert, T.L., "Hohenberg-Kohn theorem for nonlocal external potentials". Phys. Rev. B , 12: 2111-2120, 1975 2. Harriman, J.E., "Orthonormal orbitals for the representation of an arbitrary density". Phys. Rev. A , 24: 680-682, 1980 3. Lieb, E.H., "Density functionals for Coulomb systems". Int. J. Quantum Chem. , 24: 243-277, 1983 – gildardo Mar 27 '14 at 8:23
I can confirm that Gilbert, in his paper, shows that any non-negative density function $n(\vec{r})$ which satisfies $\int d\vec{r}\ n(\vec{r})=N$ is what Gilbert calls 'N-representable'. The final sentence of his paper reads 'Hence, an obvious corollary is that any N-representable particle density $n(\vec{r})$ can be obtained from a single Slater determinant' – Danu Mar 27 '14 at 8:44
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The short answer is: No, it is not true without other strong hypotheses.

What it is true is that any completely antisymmetric wavefunction $\psi(x_1,\ldots,x_N) \in L^2(\mathbb R^{3N})$ (not necessarily solution of Schroedinger equation) can always be written as a, generally infinite, linear combination of Slater determinants.

Indeed, if $\{\phi_k\}_{k=1,2\ldots,}$ is a Hilbert basis of $L^2(\mathbb R^3)$ and $\phi \in L^2(\mathbb R^{3N})$ then: $$\phi(x_1,\ldots,x_N) = \sum_{i_1,\ldots, i_N} C_{i_1...i_N} \phi_{i_1}(x_1)\cdots \phi_{i_n}(x_N)$$ where the convergence is that in $L^2$. Then consider the orthogonal projector $A$ from $L^2(\mathbb R^{3N})$ onto the subspace of completely antisymmetric wavefunctions. if $\phi$ is generic, $\psi = A\phi$ is the generic completely antisymmetric wavefunction, so we have that any completely antisymmetric wavefunction of $N$ entries can be decomposed as: $$\psi(x_1,\ldots, x_N) = \sum_{i_1,\ldots, i_N} C_{i_1...i_N} A(\phi_{i_1}(x_1)\cdots \phi_{i_n}(x_N)) \:.$$ Above $$A(\phi_{i_1}(x_1)\cdots \phi_{i_n}(x_N))$$ is nothing but the Slater determinant of $\phi_{i_1}(x_1)\:,\ldots\:, \phi_{i_n}(x_N)$.
The generalization to the case where $x_k$ includes spin variables is obvious.

share|cite|improve this answer
That is what I suspected... of course, there is a subset of functions which can be represented by a single Slater determinant. The further point I am not completely clear is rather about the density derivable from an antisymmetric wave function $\rho(x) = \int |\psi(x, x_2,\ldots,x_N)|^2 dx_2\ldots dx_N$. Gilbert's paper I mention in the comments (and @Danu has confirmed that it) states that "any" density can be derived from a single slater determinant. It can't be ANY density since it is derived from a subset, correct? And what conditions are imposed on such a density? – gildardo Mar 27 '14 at 9:27
What I am concerned with is the conceptual and mathematical basis of Density Functional theory, and the Kohn-Sham ansatz concerning the construction of the "non-interacting" reference system – gildardo Mar 27 '14 at 9:32
My feeling is that the statement concerning densities may be correct for ANY positive density, but I do not know that paper and, sorry, I have no spare tame to try to construct a proof. – Valter Moretti Mar 27 '14 at 10:56
The point is that for a density $\rho(x)$ you have much many constraints on a possible Slater determinant producing it, since you are given a function of a unique variable $x$ and you have to look for $n$ functions $\psi_j$ each of a corresponding variable $x_1,\ldots, x_N$ to fill the identity $\rho(x) = \int |A(\psi_1(x)\psi_2(x_2)\cdots \psi_n(x_N))|^2 dx_2\cdots dx_N$. – Valter Moretti Mar 27 '14 at 11:08
Sorry for all my typos above. I hope you understand, I am in a hurry. I wrote "much many constraints" but I actually meant "many fewer constraints". – Valter Moretti Mar 27 '14 at 11:19

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.