Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

In $p+ip$ superconductivity, a term in the Hamiltonian (in polar coordinates) is $$ H=\int \mathrm{d}^2\vec{r} \left[ \left( \partial_r -\frac{i}{r} \partial_{\theta} \right) \psi^\dagger(\vec{r}) \right] \psi^\dagger(\vec{r}) $$ where $\psi^\dagger$ is the field operator that creates a spinless fermion. To follow convention and arrange the term as a matrix element, it should be possible to put it on the form: $$ H=\int \mathrm{d}^2\vec{r} \; \psi^\dagger(\vec{r}) \left( -\partial_r +\frac{i}{r} \partial_{\theta} \right) \psi^\dagger(\vec{r}) $$ Which is to say the two factors anti-commute, or at least the commutator is something that becomes a constant when integrated? My question is how to show this is possible? I have tried expanding $\psi^\dagger = \sum \psi_k a_k^\dagger$, but I am not sure if the basis is supposed to depend on the boundary conditions or not. I am also not quite sure how to calculate the commutator between the differential operators and the creation operator, $a_k^\dagger$, either.

share|improve this question
    
i) The transition from the first to the second line could be seen as an integration by part. ii) The anti-commutation of the fermionic operator is a property you require from the outset, not something you can prove with commuting operators : in short, the transition between the first to the second line is a definition. iii) There is no rule for the commutation of the creation/annihilation operators and the derivative : in short, see i). In any case, the derivative is no longer a derivative in the momentum-$k$-space onto which $a_k$ projects. –  FraSchelle Mar 25 at 10:49

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.