Take the 2-minute tour ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm having some problems with an assignment where I have to state the Hamiltonian from the kinetic energy $T$ and potential energy $U$. These are as follows:

$$T(\dot{x},\dot{y})=2m\dot{x}^{2}+\frac{1}{2}m\dot{y}^{2}-m\dot{x}\dot{y}$$ and $$U(x,y)=-mgy+\frac{1}{2}k(y-l_{0})^{2}+U_{0},$$ where $m$, $g$, $k$, $l_{0}$ and $U_{0}$ are constants.

Now, I have to derive the generalised momenta $p_{x}$ and $p_{y}$, which I do with the equation:

$$p_{x}=\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{x}}$$ and $$p_{y}=\frac{\partial T}{\partial \dot{y}},$$ and I'm using only $T$ since the potential $U$ does not depend on the generalized coordinates.

This is pretty straightforward, and I end out with $\dot{x}$ and $\dot{y}$ given by the momenta as: $$\dot{x}=\frac{p_{x}+p_{y}}{4m}$$ and $$\dot{y}=\frac{p_{x}+p_{y}}{m}$$ Now the Hamiltonian should be simple to get, since I only have to insert these into the equation for the kinetic energy. But, according to the solution, I have to show that the Hamiltonian is given by: $$H(x,y,p_{x},p_{y}) = \frac{1}{6m}(p_{x}^{2}+2p_{x}p_{y}+4p_{y}^{2}) + U$$ But if I do what I said above I instead get: $$H(x,y,p_{x},p_{y}) = \frac{3}{8m}(p_{x}^{2}+2p_{x}p_{y}+p_{y}^{2}) + U$$ And I really can't figure out where I'm doing it wrong. Is my way to go not the correct ? Expressing $\dot{x}$ and $\dot{y}$ with respect to the momenta, and then just inserting it in the kinetic energy ?

Don't think the solution is wrong, but you never know. So yeah, I need some help to get moving :)

share|improve this question
    
I think the velocities dependent of momentums are wrong by your calculation. In addition, the hamiltonian is a function of coordinate and momentum, not the coordinate and its derivative. –  qfzklm Mar 20 at 17:39
    
Ahhh, yes, typo in the Hamiltonian. But why is $m\dot{x} \neq p_{x}$ ? Isn't that the definition of momentum ? –  Denver Dang Mar 20 at 17:46
2  
You've defined the momentum $p_x=\partial T/\partial\dot{x}$, no? –  Kyle Kanos Mar 20 at 18:03
    
Hmmm, I can see that that doesn't make much sense no :/ But that seems to make it difficult to get rid of the $\dot{x}$ and $\dot{y}$, or am I missing something ? –  Denver Dang Mar 20 at 18:10
1  
I haven't tried it, but I imagine a little bit of algebra will go a long way. –  Kyle Kanos Mar 20 at 18:21

1 Answer 1

Well, you better check your "pretty straightforward" calculation again, as $$\dot{x}\neq\frac{p_{x}+p_{y}}{4m}$$ and $$\dot{y}\neq\frac{p_{x}+p_{y}}{m}.$$

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.