Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Please can someone provided me with academic literature (Journals/Books, titles & links) which discuss the current view on space time i.e. that there is not Infinitely many points of space-time?

share|cite|improve this question
The premise of your question (that the current view on spacetime is that 'there are not infinitely many point of it') is questionable at best. Where did you get this idea? – Danu Mar 17 '14 at 12:27
Is this question about a possible discreteness of space-time? – pfnuesel Mar 17 '14 at 12:47
Are you familiar with the mathematical concepts of infinity, to wit: Aleph-null, Aleph-one, etc.? – Carl Witthoft Mar 17 '14 at 13:27
Sounds like the OP is interested in lattice field theory on a $n$-torus (or some other topologically exotic space)...also see Jacobson and Foster's "Quantum field theory on a growing lattice" arXiv:hep-th/0407019 – Alex Nelson Mar 17 '14 at 13:51

This is a nice introduction to Loop Quantum Theory in which both space and time are the result of weaving together fundamental quantum of space itself. I am sending you too a page which contains several links and options for the study of this theory.

Enjoy it

share|cite|improve this answer
I agree that loop quantum gravity is relevant, but would stress that it's not the most popular theory of quantum gravity. Also, maybe there is something to say about quantum foam? – innisfree Mar 17 '14 at 14:28
Minor comment to the post (v1): In the future please link to abstract pages rather than pdf files, e.g., – Qmechanic Mar 17 '14 at 18:00

this is my paper which show that the space in some special curved spacetime is discreete by using one form of generalized uncertainty principle. This paper has been published in {Advances in High Energy Physics}

share|cite|improve this answer
Dear user42958: Welcome to Phys.SE. Are you in any way related to the linked article? For your information, Physics.SE has a policy that it is OK to cite oneself, but it should be stated clearly and explicitly in the answer itself, not in attached links. – Qmechanic Mar 20 '14 at 17:14
Answers are usually reserved for more detailed responses. In the future you should leave this type of response as a comment. – Chris Mueller Mar 20 '14 at 17:28

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.