Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Witten's 1981 paper "Search for a realistic Kaluza-Klein theory" is frequently cited for its observation that, in a compactification of d=11 supergravity on a manifold with SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) isometry, left-handed and right-handed fermions would transform in the same way under the gauge group, in opposition to experiment. Years later, in the era of M-theory, Acharya and Witten were able to get chiral fermions by compactifying on a manifold with singularities. But Witten 1981 also mentioned, at the end, that coupling to a torsion field might produce chiral asymmetry. (Subsequent explorations of the idea: for and against.)

Now I'm wondering: Can torsion in M-theory revive the 1970s version of Kaluza-Klein theory? A very recent paper constructed CFT duals for M-theory on AdS4 x M111 with torsion flux, M111 being one of the "Mpqr manifolds" with SU(3) x SU(2) x U(1) isometry group that was considered in Witten 1981. (The Mpqr notation is Witten's; in a more recent notation this manifold is designated M3,2 or sometimes Y2,3.) Can M-theory on such a background give rise to chiral fermions?

share|cite|improve this question
Good links. I am afraid that you found expert enough papers that you would have to ask their authors to stage a battle here instead of asking someone else. ;-) Did Wu and Zee really say that they can't get chirality? It looks that they only say that they don't get the right representations. – LuboŇ° Motl May 25 '11 at 10:47
"We conclude that with the introduction of torsion, Kaluza-Klein theories can have massless fermions, but not chiral fermions." – Mitchell Porter May 29 '11 at 5:15

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.