Sign up ×
Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

I read that any observable operator may be represented as:

$$\Omega = \sum_n \omega _n | \omega _n \rangle \langle \omega_n |$$

Where the little omegas are the eigenvectors/eigenvalues of the operator. Now, this definition is completely useless for doing any sort of calculation.

  1. So suppose I want to find the position representation of the momentum operator. I have $$P = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dp \ p | p \rangle \langle p|.$$ In position representation, this becomes $$\langle x | P = \int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dp \ p \langle x| p \rangle \langle p|.$$ This is supposed to be equal to $-i \hbar \partial_x$. But how does one get there?

  2. How to find out the overlap $\langle x| p \rangle$?

  3. What additional input does one have to make?

share|cite|improve this question
Comment to the question (v2): Subquestions 2 and 3 is essentially a duplicate of this Phys.SE post. –  Qmechanic Mar 7 '14 at 20:18

1 Answer 1

One gets there by noting that $\langle x | p \rangle = e^{i p x/\hbar}$ is a plane wave, and you have to throw on the test wave function to talk about the derivative operation. So, you are worried about \begin{equation} \langle x| P | \Psi \rangle = \int dp ~p~ e^{i p x/\hbar} ~\langle p | \Psi \rangle \end{equation} From there you note that you can get the $p$ inside the integral by taking an $x$-derivative and after some algebra and removing the identity operator for $|p \rangle \langle p|$ you find that \begin{equation} \langle x| P | \Psi \rangle = - i \hbar \partial_x \langle x | \Psi \rangle \end{equation}

The point is that you really need to be careful about an operator and its basis-dependent representation. $\hat{P} = - i \hbar \partial_x$ in the x basis. It has other representations in other basis sets, and you have to specify that when you are writing down a concrete representation. It's similar to how the position vector $\vec{r}$ exists, but then the individual components have a basis representation in Cartesian, or cylindrical, or hyperbolic, or …, coordinates.

Edit: just worked through the derivation You want to know the matrix element $\langle x|P|\Psi \rangle$. Then you have, clearly, that \begin{equation} \langle x | P | \Psi \rangle = \int dx' \langle x | P | x' \rangle \langle x' | \Psi \rangle \end{equation} From the commutator relation matrix element, you get that \begin{equation} \langle x'| \left [ X, P \right ]| x \rangle = - i \hbar \langle x' | x \rangle \end{equation} which leads to \begin{equation} - i \hbar \frac{\langle x' | x \rangle}{x' - x} = \langle x' | P | x \rangle \end{equation} so then we get that \begin{equation} \langle x | P | \Psi \rangle = \lim_{x' \rightarrow x} - i \hbar \frac{\langle x' | \Psi \rangle}{x' - x} = - i \hbar \partial_x \langle x | \Psi \rangle \end{equation} Make $|\Psi \rangle = | p \rangle$ and you get the plane wave solution, with the caveat that there may be a sign error or two in here.

share|cite|improve this answer
I don't understand where this came from: $\langle x | p \rangle = e^{i p x/\hbar}$ –  DepeHb Mar 7 '14 at 21:10
@DepeHb: Momentum is that which is conserved if you translate the system. Turns out the operator $T_d$ which shifts a function $f(x)$ by $d$ can be written as $\exp\left(i\hbar\,d\,\left(\frac{1}{i\hbar}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\right)\right)$. The generator is the momentum operator $\propto\frac{\partial}{\partial x}$ and so as function of $x$, the eigenstates $\left|p\right\rangle$ of that operator must be $\mathrm{e}^{cpx}$. –  NikolajK Mar 7 '14 at 22:15
Actually, you can derive it from the commutator relations. I can't remember the derivation off the top of my head, but Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics in Chapter 1 I seem to recall has it spelled out in detail. –  webb Mar 7 '14 at 23:50

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.