Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

On Wikipedia it says that the two peculiar properties of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) are: confinement and asymptotic freedom.

Asymptotic freedom is the idea that at low energies we cannot use perturbation theory because the coupling becomes extremely strong. One the other hand, at sufficiently high energies, the coupling becomes very small and so we can use perturbation theory. This can all be determined by investigating the $\beta$-function.

My question is:

Why is the asymptotic freedom of quarks not considered to be a sufficient explanation for confinement?

My logic:

According to asymptotic freedom: at low energies the coupling becomes so strong that quarks cannot be isolated which explains confinement. If I am right (which I'm probably not), then why is confinement still considered to be such a mystery?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 9 down vote accepted

It's not a sufficient explanation. There are asymptotically free theories which are not strongly coupled in the IR.

The rate at which the coupling gets strong is important. In QCD, it seems to get strong very quickly near the confinement scale, so that beyond a certain scale, you only see hadrons. It is not really understood how this works. The perturbation theory suggests it could happen, as you've observed, but one can not trust perturbation theory at strong coupling.

share|cite|improve this answer
Very familiar with the kondo effect – Nogueira May 2 at 3:37

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.