Physics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for active researchers, academics and students of physics. It's 100% free.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

This is potentially a very stupid question but I'm going to ask it anyway. With all these huge buildings such as the Abu Dhabi Mosque, where an unbelievable amount of materials such as marble was moved from one side of the earth to the other, is it possible that if we 'shift enough stuff' that we could change the earths centre of gravity, and potentially alter its orbit?

share|cite|improve this question
1  
    
Perhaps dumping a lot of CO2 in the atmosphere causing the Antarctic ice sheet to melt would make some measurable impact on the Earth's rotation period. – Count Iblis Mar 21 at 17:34
up vote 7 down vote accepted

No, these building are still tiny compared to earth's crust mass distribution. One would need to build whole mountain ranges to detect changes in earth gravity field with high precision instruments. And even those wouldn't changed earth orbit measurably because even a mountain range is tiny compared to the mass of the whole earth.

However mountain ranges (and their rock density) do have a measurable influence on earth's gravity and this measured by satellite missions like grace.


PS: And no, it's not a stupid question. But you could submit it to xkcd's "what if?" section ;) .

share|cite|improve this answer
    
+1 for beating me to the suggestion to send to what-if :-) – Carl Witthoft Mar 6 '14 at 12:34
    
One interesting thing is that high-precision pendulum clocks are (were) just such high-precision instruments. There is evidence that changes in local gravity (due, I think, to water-table changes) are one of the things that limits the accuracy of such clocks. This has only really been known since their performance could be compared with atomic clocks. – tfb Mar 21 at 9:54

Just one important note: no amount of "shifting of stuff" will change the Earth's orbit. The centre of mass will have the same orbit, no matter the shifting (unless you "shift" to escape velocity :)). You'll slightly affect the tidal effects that continuously change the Earth's orbit, but those are already quite weak. It will probably have a bigger effect on the Moon than the Earth, I'd guess.

The centre of gravity changes all the time, including "building huge buildings". However, those changes are miniscule - don't forget how much mass there is in the Earth's core, that's quite hard to dislodge. However, gravity changes are important locally (though buildings still don't quite cut it; something like the de-oceanization of the Netherlands might be closer to the mark). For example, one of the things that lead to the development of the theory of continental drift was mapping of India by the British Empire. Their efforts were hindered by the (relatively) huge gravitational anomalies on the subcontinent - different measurement methods gave vastly different distances for the same paths. Good luck making an accurate map :)

Moving plates also affect the rotation of the Earth - yet another example of the conservation of angular momentum. However, more importantly, so do some human mega-structures - most notably, diverting the flows of rivers and building reservoirs for water power plants. Mind you, it's still not something you'll notice, but it's well within our measurement abilities :)

share|cite|improve this answer

I believe that the only construction project that has had an effect on the Earth's rotation (not orbit), was the Three Gorges Dam in China.

Even then, the tiny fraction of a second (0.6 microseconds, in fact) difference was because of the mass of water gathered behind it rather than the dam itself.

Business Insider article

Also, the difference in rotation is only known by calculation, as it is much too small to be directly measured.

Additionally, please note that powerful earthquakes have a larger effect on the earth's rotation.

Nasa.gov link

share|cite|improve this answer
    
Please add a reference to your post, maybe: jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.php?release=2005-009 – pentane Mar 21 at 15:48

protected by Qmechanic Mar 21 at 15:51

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.