2
$\begingroup$

Does the expression $\langle \Psi_i|U(t)|\Psi_i\rangle$ have a specific meaning, where $U(T)$ is the unitary time evolution operator of $\Psi$, and $\Psi_i$ is the initial state of $\Psi$?

If so, could you please explain that meaning and also please provide any clear references to this that I could read?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

6
$\begingroup$

To talk about $\langle \psi_i \vert U(t) \vert \psi_i \rangle$ as the "expectation value of the time evolution operator" is probably the least insightful way to talk about this quantity. Since $U(t) = \exp(-\mathrm{i}Ht)$ for time-independent Hamiltonians, if you want to look at expectation values, you could as well look at that of $H$ directly. Note that, in particular, the time evolution operator is not self-adjoint, since $U(t)^\dagger = U(-t)\neq U(t)$, so it is not an observable, and speaking of its "expectation value" is physically meaningless.

The physical meaning is clearer when you realize that $\lvert \langle \psi_i \vert U(t)\vert \psi_i\rangle\rvert^2$ is the probability (assuming the states are normalized) to find a system that was at time $t_0 = 0$ in the state $\lvert \psi_i \angle$ again in the same state after the time $t$ has passed, hence $\langle \psi_i \vert U(t) \vert \psi_i \rangle$ is the "transition amplitude for a state into itself". This is probably most interesting when the $\lvert \psi_i\rangle$ are eigenstates of an operator that is being measured.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Have you got any idea what necessary and sufficient conditions on the operator $H$ would be so that the transition amplitude $|\langle \psi_{i}|U(t)|\psi_{i}\rangle|^{2}$ decays to zero as $t\rightarrow \infty$? $\endgroup$
    – Hldngpk
    Jan 26, 2023 at 2:14
  • $\begingroup$ @Hldngpk This is not a property of $H$ as much as it is a property of the state. Consider that that amplitude is constant when $\lvert \psi_i\rangle$ is an eigenstate of $H$ no matter what $H$ is. $\endgroup$
    – ACuriousMind
    Jan 26, 2023 at 8:06
  • $\begingroup$ Excellent point! $\endgroup$
    – Hldngpk
    Jan 26, 2023 at 9:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.